[sc34wg3] The Norwegian National Body position on ISO 13250

[Marc de Graauw]

Patrick Durusau wrote:

| You seem to be mixing two issues in your post. One is the lack of a
| "standard Schema language" and the other is the need for TMCL/TMQL.
| Are
| both seen as problems? Noting that the SAM proposal would not answer
| the problem of lack of a Schema language.

Apologies, I have not made myself very clear. Most of the SIG members here
do not follow the SC34 work very closely - for them, and quite rightly so,
the existing ISO and XTM standards are the stuff to look at. So when we
discussed those issues it was expressed as a lack of a schema language, not
'lack of a TMCL'. I should not have repeated 'schema language' from those
discussions but should have said 'constraint language' or TMCL.

Marc