[sc34wg3] draft Reference Model

[Steve Pepper]

At 09:39 10/04/02 -0400, Mason, James David (MXM) wrote:
>The editors issued a document, Sara gave it a number, and we put the thing
>up on the Web. About a day later, the editors said they wanted to issue a
>revision with some bug fixes resulting from the first questions. That's OK,
>but it ought to go up on the Web, too, probably as N298 Rev.

I agree.

>The discussion is ongoing, and I suspect another new document will emerge
>before Barcelona. I think that document should get a new number. Even if we
>go through several new numbers in the next month, that will be OK. But we
>need to set down benchmarks so we can all know what document we're talking
>about (and so that we're all talking about the same thing).

Absolutely. I would hope that this particular document can now remain stable.

Steve