parid0402 | Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:00:12
Each such node demander must be defined as being associated with a specific node whose existence in the topic map graph that the instance represents can reasonably be regarded as being "demanded" by the existence of the demander.
The definition of each such node demander must specify the situation feature in the topic map graph of the SPP's governing application that is to be regarded as having been demanded by the existence of the demander.
Demanders don't demand specific nodes, do they?
—shunting@etopicality.com
parid0402 | Sat, 01 Mar 2003 16:30:41
A list of syntactic constructs ("node demanders") whose instances can be unambiguously addressed within the instances of the syntax must be provided. Each such node demander must be defined as being associated with a specific node whose existence in the topic map graph that the instance represents can reasonably be regarded as being "demanded" by the existence of the demander.
An addressable syntactic construct in the syntax must be represented as a node in the topic map graph.
Is there such a thing as ambiguously addressed syntactic
constructs? Shortened.
—pdurusau@emory.edu