parid0158
| Sat, 01 Feb 2003 07:46:46
I question whether > unplayed is a term that should be defined rather than removed from the text as being unhelpful.
parid0158
| Sat, 01 Feb 2003 07:46:46
I question whether > unplayed is a term that should be defined rather than removed from the text as being unhelpful. EMD Martin Bryan IS-Thought: Thinkers for the Information Society 29 Oldbury Orchard, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: 01452 714029 E-mail: martin@is-thought.co.uk Thought of the week: Thoughts need time and space: do we have enough time or space? -- Patrick Durusau Director of Research and Development Society of Biblical Literature pdurusau@emory.edu Co-Editor, ISO Reference Model for Topic Maps *********************************************************** From shunting@etopicality.com Sat Feb 8 10:52:17 2003 Return-Path:
parid0158
| Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:04:28
In any given assertion, each role type is either played by a single
subject, represented by a single node, or the role type is "unplayed",
i.e., the role type has no role player. Multiple subjects cannot play
the same role in the same assertion.
(strike)
Node are already required to represent a single subject. So, multiple subjects could not play the same role in the same assertion by definition. Yes, roles are either played or not, not sure I need a section on that idea. Note use of role and not role type. |