My concern is also to know if an axiomatization of RM4TM as a
mathematical graph will meet a documented and well-known type of graph, or
some weird form that nobody has cared to study yet.
>I will investigate on all that, and could report in Baltimore if I am
>given the
>opportunity to do it.
As an invited expert on this mailing list, you are also an invited expert
to any WG3 meeting, including the one to be held in Baltimore. The Reference
Model will be discussed in depth on the Monday, so I suggest you try and
attend on that day at least.
As convenor of WG3 I would be happy to give you some time to present your
findings, but you should be aware that there will probably be a lot going
on on that day, so be prepared to squeeze your report into a fairly short
time, perhaps as little as half an hour (including discussion).
I will be suggesting that Steve N and Michel take charge of the agenda for
most of Monday (once we have some other minor details out of the way).
Steve
--
Steve Pepper, Chief Executive Officer
Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps)
Ontopia AS, Waldemar Thranes gt. 98, N-0175 Oslo, Norway.
http://www.ontopia.net/ phone: +47-23233080 GSM: +47-90827246
_______________________________________________
sc34wg3 mailing list
sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3
***********************************************************
From shunting@etopicality.com Fri Jan 31 13:02:09 2003
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: iso@mail.petesbox.net
Received: from www1.martnet.com (phuqed.org [207.19.97.109])
by amati.petesbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D1D14C033
for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:02:09 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (shunting@localhost)
by www1.martnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id OAA32601
for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:01:49 -0500
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:01:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hunting
X-Sender: shunting@www1.martnet.com
To: issues@isotopicmaps.org
Subject: Re: [sc34wg3] Draft Reference Model (fwd)
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_RFCI,AWL version=2.20
X-Spam-Level:
bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
Sam Hunting
eTopicality, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Turn your searching experience into a finding experience."(tm)
Topic map consulting and training: www.etopicality.com
Free open source topic map tools: www.gooseworks.org
XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
Question en paasant : Why not use the word "topic" instead of
"node" throughout? To what
extent is the above different of all the existing prose in ISO 13250, XTM 1.0, Published
Subjects TC ... "In a topic map, a topic is the formal representation of a single
subject". The notion of having nodes in the TMG representing "implicit" subjects that are
not topics in the corresponding topic map is IMO extremely confusing and hard to grasp.