parid0181
| Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:47:56
I think the role types are mandatory for 2 reasons, one general and one specific to tm models. The general one is that you may want to make some assertion between two things but not really know what that assertion is yet. A real world example would be to transforms someones folder structure into a tm. Folder structures are weak (non-existant) on what the relationship is, but the user probably has a good idea about it. Thus having empty role types and empty assoc type allows for the association to be refined later. A very useful property when dealing with iterative topicmap construction. (Personally, I like all my types defined and organised but appreciate that that isnt everyones world.) The second reason for leaving types undefined is because that is the nature of scope. I think we came to some consensus in montreal that scope is no more than untyped associations between an association and a set of topics. |