|
parid0929
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:47:56
—gdm@empolis.co.uk
parid0929
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:47:56
This picks up on Bernard's point regarding Sets in RM. I appreciate that RM does not subscribe to any mathematical set model but i wonder about when do individuals become sets? I'm not sure I found it but if I have two assertions in different maps where: graham worksfor empolis gmbh graham worksfor empolis uk and I merge them what happens? is it now true that graham worksfor [empolis gmbh, empolis uk] through merging, or are the two assertions seperate?
parid0929
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:47:56
This picks up on Bernard's point regarding Sets in RM. I appreciate that RM does not subscribe to any mathematical set model but i wonder about when do individuals become sets? I'm not sure I found it but if I have two assertions in different maps where: graham worksfor empolis gmbh graham worksfor empolis uk and I merge them what happens? is it now true that graham worksfor [empolis gmbh, empolis uk] through merging, or are the two assertions seperate?
parid0929
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:47:56
This picks up on Bernard's point regarding Sets in RM. I appreciate that RM does not subscribe to any mathematical set model but i wonder about when do individuals become sets? I'm not sure I found it but if I have two assertions in different maps where: graham worksfor empolis gmbh graham worksfor empolis uk and I merge them what happens? is it now true that graham worksfor [empolis gmbh, empolis uk] through merging, or are the two assertions seperate?
parid0929
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:47:56
This picks up on Bernard's point regarding Sets in RM. I appreciate that RM does not subscribe to any mathematical set model but i wonder about when do individuals become sets? I'm not sure I found it but if I have two assertions in different maps where: graham worksfor empolis gmbh graham worksfor empolis uk and I merge them what happens? is it now true that graham worksfor [empolis gmbh, empolis uk] through merging, or are the two assertions seperate?
parid0929
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:47:56
This picks up on Bernard's point regarding Sets in RM. I appreciate that RM does not subscribe to any mathematical set model but i wonder about when do individuals become sets? I'm not sure I found it but if I have two assertions in different maps where: graham worksfor empolis gmbh graham worksfor empolis uk and I merge them what happens? is it now true that graham worksfor [empolis gmbh, empolis uk] through merging, or are the two assertions seperate? |