[tmql-wg] Proposed requirements: Operations on primitive types
Lars Marius Garshol
larsga@garshol.priv.no
22 Jul 2003 14:29:57 +0200
* Chris Angus
|
| It is not clear to me that TM standards are oblivious to typing
| given the existence of published subject indicators for
| "class-instance", "class" and "instance". What XTM 1.0 does not
| include are any published subject indicators for classes that
| represent underlying data types such as "number" and "date".
That is of course true. I assumed Robert implicitly meant that the TM
standards are oblivious to *primitive* types and responded to that,
but you are of course right.
--
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >