[tmql-wg] Proposed new requirement: Database implementation

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Kal Ahmed
|
| To be honest then I think that this is a non-requirement. 
|
| Actually, its worse than that, its and over-requirement - we
| shouldn't let the TMQL work be trapped into supporting a relational
| model of the SAM any more than we should let it be trapped into
| supporting a hierarchical or object-oriented implementation of the
| SAM. That is probably best done by letting the TMQL work be driven
| by the requirements for the TMQL language without consideration to
| implementation against any model other than than the SAM.

Hmmmm. I think you are presenting this as worse than it is, but that's
not to say you are not making sense.

So far we have one +1 (me), one +/-0 (Robert), and one -1 (Kal). Looks
like this requirement is going to stay out of the document unless
someone is willing to speak up for it.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >