[sc34wg3] Some more inconsistencies in the tmcl schema
Michael Quaas
michaelquaas at web.de
Mon Oct 26 06:05:14 EDT 2009
I think I've found some more.
6. There is a unique-occurrence-constraint defined (line 212) but never
used. Otherwise in the constrained-statement role-combination
definitions is a unique-value-constraint used (lines 237+239) which is
not defined. Guess the unique-occurrence-constraint should be renamed in
unique-value-constraint, as it is allowed to constrain occurrence-types
and name-types.
7. In the constrained-statement role-combination definitions is an
other-role-constraint used (line 239) but not defined in the schema.
Michael Quaas
More information about the sc34wg3
mailing list