[sc34wg3] Media type registration for XTM

[Graham Moore]

Interoperability considerations: It is RECOMMENDED that XTM documents
use the new XTM 2.0 syntax [ISO13250-3] as opposed to the older XTM
1.0 syntax [XTM1.0]. In general use of features of XML which XML
processors may choose not to support should be avoided.

Based on the timings will XTM 2.1 be 'out' before this?


2009/11/20 Lars Marius Garshol <larsga at garshol.priv.no>:
>
> * Lars Marius Garshol
>>
>> I've written a first draft of a media type registration for XTM:
>>  http://www.isotopicmaps.org/sam/xtm-rfc.html
>
>
> The draft has been updated based on comments received on the ietf-types mailing list. I plan to submit it as an Internet-Draft for consideration by the RFC Editor later today.
>
> --Lars M.
> http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
> http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc34wg3 mailing list
> sc34wg3 at isotopicmaps.org
> http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3
>



-- 
Graham Moore, Director, Networked Planet Limited
Editor XTM 1.0, ISO13250 (TopicMaps) -2,-3, TMCL
e: graham.moore at networkedplanet.com
w: www.networkedplanet.com
t: +44 1865 811131
m: +44 7769658611 (UK)
m: +47 45271713   (Norway)

Networked Planet Limited is registered in England and Wales, no. 5273377