[sc34wg3] More on TMCL MAX_INT

Lars Heuer heuer at semagia.com
Sat Feb 28 09:36:38 EST 2009


Hi all,

[...]
> Yes. That's why I don't like this proposal. Note that "*" and
> "unbounded" amount to the same thing, unless we invent our own
> datatype. Whatever we do, none of these values are valid xsd:integers.

Right, I agree with the other Lars. Either we should use INF
(xsd:double) or we should use cardinality topics. Contrarily to Lars
Marius, my preference goes to INF, though.

If someone wants to invent another datatype, I'd switch to cardinality topics.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia
<http://www.semagia.com/>


More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list