[sc34wg3] Embedded topics as association type?
Lars Marius Garshol
larsga at garshol.priv.no
Mon Feb 23 09:04:31 EST 2009
* Lars Heuer
>
> Seriously: As we introduced embedded topics we agreed that we do not
> want them at the top level in a CTM document. But if we allow embedded
> topics as association types, we'd have embedded topics at the top
> level of a CTM file.
Ahhhhh. Right. Yes. Indeed.
> We both talked about it and we agreed that we shouldn't allow
> embedded topics as association types because users might create
> association types without an explicit identity:
>
> [- "member of"](member: john, group: The-Beatles)
True, although not sufficient reason in itself. But the above was
indeed the reason.
--Lars M.
http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/
http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
More information about the sc34wg3
mailing list