[sc34wg3] Subordinate clauses

[Lars Heuer]

Hi Dmitry,

[...]
> Common Lisp and lack of them in Ruby. What makes me nervous is how  
> different pieces are chosen and packaged together in the current CTM  
> draft.

Okay, that's a valid point, if you think that CTM is not coherent. You
should explain that in more detail. Do you talk about the syntax or
the feature-set when you say it makes you nervous "[...] how
different pieces are chosen and packaged together [...]"? Both?

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
http://www.semagia.com