[sc34wg3] Subordinate clauses

[Lars Heuer]

Hi Dmitry,

[Changes cost time]
> I understand this. But when I look at N3 and pre/post Kyoto CTM
> draft, I think that we did not have enough productive discussions
> about CTM with listening and understanding of different proposals and concerns.

Okay, but from my POV we're going round in circles.

A bit CTM-history:
- We started with <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/0776c.htm>
- Which evolved to: <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/0789c.htm>
  (aka. "CTM with curly braces")
- We discussed the "CTM with curly braces" syntax in Leipzig 2006.
  This syntax was too complex and Graham and Lars Marius made a
  proposal which is mentioned here:
  <http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/75.html>
- That proposal was well received and we used it as starting point for
  CTM presented in Oslo 2007:
  <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/0820.htm>
- We got the impression from the Oslo-WG meeting that this is the path to
  go and this resulted after a few iterations into current CTM draft
  (N0935).
- Kyoto seems to go back to N0789 and that's a bit surprising since
  that syntax was not well received in Leipzig 2006.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
http://www.semagia.com