[sc34wg3] CTM - pre-Kyoto vs. post-Kyoto comparison
Robert Barta
rho at devc.at
Tue Jan 29 03:38:39 EST 2008
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:11:24AM +0900, Jaeho Lee wrote:
> class HelloWorld {
> public static void main (String args[]) {
> System.out.print("Hello World ");
> }
> }
> Even if it is verbose, I would stick with the last one.
I did not realize that "verboseness" was an objective (or a
requirement) for a __Compact_ TM notation. If so, than the current
proposal has overfulfilled it.
But it can be topped:
http://kill.devc.at/node/120
> As I read through the comparison list at
> <http://www.semagia.com/tmp/ctm-comparison.html>, toward the end of the
> list, that is, toward the REAL cases, I was convinced that explicit
> delimiters "{ ; }" make sense.
Interesting, I just had the inverse conviction from that observation.
\rho
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sc34wg3-bounces at isotopicmaps.org
> [mailto:sc34wg3-bounces at isotopicmaps.org] On Behalf Of Lars Heuer
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:37 AM
> To: Discussion of ISO/IEC 13250 Topic Maps
> Subject: [sc34wg3] CTM - pre-Kyoto vs. post-Kyoto comparison
>
> Hi all,
>
> I started a pre-Kyoto vs. post-Kyoto comparison for CTM based on our
> CTM use cases:
> <http://www.semagia.com/tmp/ctm-comparison.html>
>
> I hope this helps a bit to see the differences.
>
> It is not complete yet, but I have to run now.
>
> Best regards,
> Lars
> --
> http://www.semagia.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc34wg3 mailing list
> sc34wg3 at isotopicmaps.org
> http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc34wg3 mailing list
> sc34wg3 at isotopicmaps.org
> http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3
>
--
And then he said: "You should read my blog." http://kill.devc.at/
More information about the sc34wg3
mailing list