[sc34wg3] TMCL: 4.4.7 Not DisJoint Constraint
Robert Barta
rho at devc.at
Thu Feb 14 07:22:37 EST 2008
The constraint says
"... provides a way to express that a topic can be an instance of both
of referenced types."
Firstly, from where is the underlying assumption that types are
per-se disjoint?
Or should this be the other way round, like in OWL with owl:disjoint?
And secondly, why does this only affect two types? Why not 3, or more?
Is this just a limitation carried over from CTM as that cannot take a
list of parameters?
Thirdly, a better example would be .... better. :-)
NotDisjointConstraint (Cat, Dog)
Typo: .. after the first sentence
\rho
--
And then he said: "You should read my blog." http://kill.devc.at/
More information about the sc34wg3
mailing list