[sc34wg3] New syntax for (binary) associations

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Lars Heuer
>
> Yes, but the problem remains that we'll mislead users to create all
> over the binary associations where one topic plays the 'subject' and
> one topic plays the 'object' role. Lazy users wouldn't use good role
> types, but the subject/object-ones. Further, the subject/object role
> types may give the impression, that associations are directed, but
> this is not the case in Topic Maps.

This also matches what I am thinking exactly.

--Lars M.