[sc34wg3] Kyoto agenda

[Patrick Durusau]

Lars,

Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>
> * Patrick Durusau
>>
>> I would suggest that we concentrate on items where a period of really 
>> intense work in Kyoto would result in substantial progress.
>
> I agree. It seems like CTM, TMCL, and TMQL are the most likely 
> candidates there. However, if Lars Heuer, Graham Moore, and Robert 
> Barta will not be there (as I've been told) I'm worried about whether 
> we really can have a complete discussion of all issues in Kyoto. All 
> three are really critical to these three standards... :-/
>
OK, assuming that to be the case, are there parts of those standards 
that we can discuss prior to Kyoto with their online participation?

And when we get to Kyoto, are there issues on those parts that we can 
discuss (usefully, I have found that we can always discuss ;-) ) in 
their absence?

There are other items where the editors will be present so we may have 
to split off what we can discuss about CTM, TMCL and TMQL and use the 
rest of the time for other parts. Such as part 1, the RDF TR, etc.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick at durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Acting Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, OpenDocument Format (OASIS, ISO/IEC 26300)