Fwd: [sc34wg3] TMDM / XTM 2.0 vs. XTM 1.0 "reification" procedure
Lars Heuer
sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:40:34 +0100
------------EC19517046A6858
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gabriel Hopmans <gabriel.hopmans@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2006 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [sc34wg3] TMDM / XTM 2.0 vs. XTM 1.0 "reification" procedure
To: sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
Hello Lars,
On 2/18/06, Lars Heuer <heuer@semagia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is my interpretation correct that in a Topic Map acc. TMDM a topic with
> a subject identifier "foo" may exist and an other topic map construct
> like a topic name with an item identifier "foo" may exist parallel?
>
> The existence of the subject identifier "foo" and the item identifier
> "foo" has no meaning?
> And if the other topic map construct is also a topic it has still no
> meaning?
I wouldn't say that there might should be so meaning but I am not exactly
sure about the meaning of your questions :)
The following doesn't help me... is there a typo ?
> In short:
> a) Topic with subject identifier "foo", name with item identifier
> "foo" => no problem, no special meaning
> b) Topic with subject identifier "bar", topic with item identifier
> "bar" => no problem, no special meaning
cheers,
Gabriel
===8<===========End of original message text===========
------------EC19517046A6858
Content-Type: TEXT/HTML; name="Message.html"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Message.html"
<br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br><span class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">From: <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Gabriel Hopmans</b> <<a href=3D"=
mailto:gabriel.hopmans@gmail.com">gabriel.hopmans@gmail.com</a>><br>Date=
: Feb 22, 2006 5:31 PM
<br>Subject: Re: [sc34wg3] TMDM / XTM 2.0 vs. XTM 1.0 "reification&quo=
t; procedure<br>To: <a href=3D"mailto:sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org">sc34wg3@iso=
topicmaps.org</a><br><br></span>Hello Lars,<br><br><br><div><span class=3D"=
q">
<span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 2/18/06, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Lars =
Heuer</b> <<a href=3D"mailto:heuer@semagia.com" target=3D"_blank" onclic=
k=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">heuer@semagia.com</a>>=
; wrote:
</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rg=
b(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi all,<br><br>Is my interpretation correct that in a Topic Map acc. TMDM a=
topic with<br>a subject identifier "foo" may exist and an other =
topic map construct<br>like a topic name with an item identifier "foo&=
quot; may exist parallel?
<br><br>The existence of the subject identifier "foo" and the ite=
m identifier<br>"foo" has no meaning?<br>And if the other topic m=
ap construct is also a topic it has still no<br>meaning?</blockquote></span>
<div>
<br>I wouldn't say that there might should be so meaning but I am not exact=
ly sure about the meaning of your questions :)<br></div><br>The following d=
oesn't help me... is there a typo ?<span class=3D"q"><br> <br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204=
); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
In short:<br>a) Topic with subject identifier "foo", name with it=
em identifier<br> "foo" =3D> no problem, no specia=
l meaning<br>b) Topic with subject identifier "bar", topic with i=
tem identifier
<br> "bar" =3D> no problem, no special meaning</bl=
ockquote></span><div><br>cheers,<br><br>Gabriel <br></div><br></div>
------------EC19517046A6858--