[sc34wg3] TMQL, State of Affairs

[Robert Barta]

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Martin Bryan wrote:
> > I tried, but obviously not successful:
> >
> >    http://topicmaps.it.bond.edu.au/docs/37
> >
> > Otherwise, everything what Jan said, hits the point.
> 
> OK, you think you have explained it. But how is a reader of the standard
> supposed to know this?

I am not sure whether such a justification should be part of a
language description. If the committee feels that - for itself and the
world - there should be a rationale, then there might a separate
document might be the place for this.

\rho