[sc34wg3] More on process ontology: ISO 18629 Process Specification Language - still more meat for the ontological stew

[Mason, James David (MXM)]

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
[mailto:owner-standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Rich Cooper
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:14 PM
To: John F. Sowa; cg@cs.uah.edu; =
standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org;
Rob Freeman
Cc: cassidy; West, Matthew R SIPC-OFD/321
Subject: Re: ISO 18629 Process Specification Language - still more meat =
for
the ontological stew

Even better:

http://www.tc184-sc4.org/SC4_Open/SC4_Work_Products_Documents/PSL_(18629)=
/1-9
9/documentation.cfm?CFID=3D213130&CFTOKEN=3D90342429&LID=3D0000#EA

Rich


> Here's are URLs that reference a number of documents about the new PSL =

> standard:
>
> http://www.tc184-sc4.org/SC4_Open/SC4_Work_Products_Documents/PSL_(186
> 29)/
>
> http://www.tc184-sc4.org/SC4_Open/SC4_Work_Products_Documents/PSL_(186
> 29)/1-99/documentation.cfm
>
> HTH,
> Rich
>
>
>> ISO has reached the last stage of approval for a new ontology that=20
>> has about 300 concepts related to temporal duration, precedence,=20
>> interval logic, time, ordering, activities, and other concepts that=20
>> they believe are related to process specification in a manufacturing=20
>> environment.  Surely these concepts are general enough to handle many =

>> kinds of discrete process descriptions.
>> Does anyone have experience, opinions, beliefs, ... about the new PSL =

>> standard?
>>
>> Rich
>>
>=20