Lars, ! This is incorrect, since 0, 1, and 2 aren't valid NAME values. ! See 5.5.2 in ISO 13250:2003. Good point (now I remember what I had to tweak :-)) But... there were a bunch of DTDs floating around at that time, so it was not a big sin. ! ! In that case, perhaps we should let sleeping issues lie, and not waste ! electrons on them. :) ! Agree. Thanks, --Nikita