[sc34wg3] Merging/Viewing subject proxies
Jan Algermissen
sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:17:13 +0200
On Jul 26, 2005, at 8:14 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> So, would an application with a limited (they all are in some
> sense) disclosure and highly optimized application for MARC records
> prove feasibility?
If you are thinking of TMRM implementations that only support a fixed
set of disclosures and do not enable the definition of user defined
disclosures (IOW: that do not support other semantics than the fixed
ones) then the situation is entirely different and an implementatuion
doable.
OTH, why would you want to use Topic Maps if you know the semantics
up front? Since you know there will never be any other semantics in
the domain your tool supports, why not use a relational database in
the first place. After all, nailed down schemas is what they are good
at! While schema evolution and integration issues are the primary use
case for Topic Maps (and the only/most compelling business case for
them, BTW).
????
Jan
________________________________________________________________________
_______________
Jan Algermissen, Consultant & Programmer
http://jalgermissen.com
Tugboat Consulting, 'Applying Web technology to enterprise IT'
http://www.tugboat.de