[sc34wg3] Compact syntax requirement question

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Murray Altheim
| 
| Perhaps I'm unclear on the real requirements we're talking about
| here -- I was under the impression that a requirement for ID support
| would be used by those building processors that would be able to
| perform deserialization of XTM document instances.

We've been talking at cross-purposes, then. I was thinking of
requirements for the new CTM syntax. ID support is already required
for XTM processors, so there's no need to add any such requirement.
 
| Precisely what I alluded to above, i.e., that Kal's particular
| experience in building TM4J would be very helpful in understanding
| the ramifications of *not* requiring IDs for XML processing of XTM
| document instances. He may have additional ideas on this as well.

I guess, but I don't really see any problems here.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >