[sc34wg3] Re: atomic?
Lars Marius Garshol
sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:07:21 +0200
* Patrick Durusau
|
| This is the only use of "atomic" and it doesn't add anything to
| fundamental. Thinking "types" should be "datatypes."
See my reply to Jan.
| Actually I would suggest recasting the first sentence as follows:
|
| "The only fundamental datatypes defined in this document are strings
| and null. Through the concept of datatypes data of any type can be
| represented in this model."
I agree that breaking the sentence in two is better. Will do.
--
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >