[sc34wg3] Re: atomic?

Lars Marius Garshol sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:07:21 +0200


* Patrick Durusau
| 
| This is the only use of "atomic" and it doesn't add anything to
| fundamental. Thinking "types" should be "datatypes."

See my reply to Jan.
 
| Actually I would suggest recasting the first sentence as follows:
| 
| "The only fundamental datatypes defined in this document are strings
| and null. Through the concept of datatypes data of any type can be
| represented in this model."

I agree that breaking the sentence in two is better. Will do.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >