[sc34wg3] TMDM bug
Geir Ove Grønmo
sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:46:41 +0100
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:09:55 +0100, Lars Marius Garshol
<larsga@ontopia.net> wrote:
>
> * Geir Ove Grønmo
> |
> | Does it make sense for the topic item to have a [reified] property
> | at all?
>
> I think so. The value of it is the information item reified by the
> topic item. Conceptually, that's a very important thing to know about
> the topic item. (In fact, *the* main thing.)
>
> Let's turn it around: do you think having a [reifier] property on
> other information items makes sense?
I agree that it might be worth having, but I'm a bit unsure about whether
it makes sense for the [reifier] property to contain another topic.
Shouldn't the topics be merged instead? Or is the reason that they are
not *automatically* merged that the TMDM does not impose merging unless
the application really want to?
--
Geir O.