[sc34wg3] RM workshop agenda

[Freese, Eric D. (LNG-DAY)]

What is the likelihood of the meeting stretching into Sunday?  My flights
got re-arranged and I won't be arriving until Saturday night now.  Just want
to know if I should try to find you on Sunday.  

Thanks!
Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sc34wg3-admin@isotopicmaps.org
> [mailto:sc34wg3-admin@isotopicmaps.org]On Behalf Of Patrick Durusau
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:26 AM
> To: sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
> Subject: Re: [sc34wg3] RM workshop agenda
> 
> 
> Lars,
> 
> Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> > Do we have an agenda for the RM workshop? Does anyone consider
> > themselves responsible for creating one? I think it's very important
> > that we have an agenda before we arrive, in order to make 
> sure we have
> > a productive meeting. If nobody else wants the task I can 
> take it on,
> > but I don't want to step on any toes here.
> > 
> 
> Apologies for the delayed response! I have been at a meetings at very 
> historical and attractive places but sans very good communication 
> infrastructure. Just arrived in Amsterdam (leave to Montreal 
> tomorrow) 
> and so am once again online!
> 
> When did you ever step on any toes? Heads yes, but toes? ;-)
> 
> I will try to crank something out in the morning before I leave but I 
> would suggest something along the following lines:
> 
> 1. Requirements for a reference model (anyone agree with should start 
> with the prior draft we composed in Montreal last summer?)
> 
> 2. Quick overview (and I do mean quick) of the various proposals in 
> light of #1 (Perhaps spend the morning, if that long on #1 and say 30 
> minutes on each proposal in the early afternoon?)
> 
> Think that such a process should put us in a position of having a 
> collective sense of where we all are on the reference model question.
> 
> I am not sure if I am "responsible" for the agenda (but I did arrange 
> for the room) and would welcome any comments or suggestions 
> that would 
> allow us to forge a common understanding of the agenda for 
> the meeting.
> 
> BTW, I have seen only briefly the traffic on your proposal and your 
> comments concerning TMQL.
> 
>  From my perspective, a reference model for topic maps should support 
> "topic maps" in the sense of ISO 13250 and any ancillary 
> standards for 
> topic maps, and not be limited to supporting TMQL/TMCL.
> 
> Hope you are having a great day!
> 
> Patrick
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Durusau
> Director of Research and Development
> Society of Biblical Literature
> Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org
> Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
> Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
> 
> Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sc34wg3 mailing list
> sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
> http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3
>