[sc34wg3] Pre-publication draft of XTM 1.1 CD

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* dmitryv@cogeco.ca
| 
| I guess this is an old issue. I am just wondering why in 4.16 one or
| zero member element can have ID.

You mean "why doesn't the RELAX-NG schema disallow IDs on the <member>
elements when there's more than one <member> element in the same
<association>"?

One answer is that nobody thought of it. :-)

Another is that it would be a break in backwards compatibility with
XTM 1.0, which I don't think is acceptable. Otherwise I think we
should have done it.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >