[sc34wg3] TNC backward compatibility
Lars Marius Garshol
sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
07 Mar 2003 08:34:37 +0100
* Nikita Ogievetsky
|
| This is good. However, I think that if SAM talks about
| <subjectIdentity> here it should be explicitly stated as such.
SAM can't talk about XTM element types. The properties it's talking
about are [source locators], [subject addresses], [subject
identifiers], and [reified].
| Otherwise only few people will understand the meaning of this rather
| abstract paragraph.
That's probably true, but I think it applies all the way throughout
the document, that either we must insert lots of tutorial text, or
this will happen. I'd rather have the tutorial text in a separate
document.
| I thought that SAM should be closer to the syntax then RM.
What do you mean?
--
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >