[sc34wg3] Reference Model to SAM - Mapping Issues and Thoughts

[Steven R. Newcomb]

Oops.  I screwed up.  I agree with Graham.  Sorry,
Graham, I should have read your note more carefully:

> 3.1 SAM -> RM -> SAM (is loss-less)

> 3.2 RM -> SAM -> RM (is loss-less in cases where
> assertions arent made about items that have no
> identifiable node in the SAM.)

> I think this is ok and if its ok with everyone else
> then I dont really see that we have a problem.

-- Steve

Steven R. Newcomb, Consultant
srn@coolheads.com

Coolheads Consulting
http://www.coolheads.com

voice: +1 972 359 8160
fax:   +1 972 359 0270

1527 Northaven Drive
Allen, Texas 75002-1648 USA