[sc34wg3] RM: built-in arc, built-in assertion, built-in node, built-in subject

[Martin Bryan]

Sam asked in response to my:

> > Please please please avoid this term. Even if it is philosophically
correct
> > it is ugly and goes against current practice in the use of "required",
> > "predefined" or "built-in".
>
> What "current practice" do you mean?

Terms used to qualify arcs. I've never seen the term a priori used to
qualify the word arcs before. I can, however, cite cases where the terms
required arcs, predefined arcs and (though only in the RM) built-in arcs.

Martin