[sc34wg3] New SAM PSIs

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Mary Nishikawa
| 
| I did not realize that the M0 model is out of scope of SAM.
| Is this an XTM syntax versus SAM issue perhaps. I am really not sure
| and would like to confirm this.

The issue is with the supertype-subtype published subject, and so not
really with the SAM data model or with the XTM syntax. We use this
published subject in LTM as well, so this issue applies equally to LTM.

| (What I mean is, you can create a M0 model in XTM syntax, but this
| is not what is in SAM?

Sure. You can just create a published subject for supertype-subtype
with M0 semantics. That would then be usable in XTM, SAM, LTM, ...

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >