[sc34wg3] occurrence - basename fuzzy border
Steve Pepper
sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:53:14 +0100
At 20:59 24.02.2003 +0100, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>* Murray Altheim:
>| This discussion begs a bigger question, i.e., is work being done
>| on a new version of XTM that is intended to
>|
>| a. fix bugs and correct documentation mistakes
>| b. add desired features not included in XTM 1.0
>
>Very well put. I've tried several times to have a principled debate on
>this within the committee, but have invariably found myself to be the
>only person interested in the subject, so I've just muddled on as best
>I could.
I don't understand this statement. Did we not, in Baltimore, discuss
and settle this very matter? And did we not agree on the following
formulation:
This is a restatement of ISO13250 where we,
1. specify a data model (RM/XTM);
2. explain relationship between HyTM to XTM;
3. produce a canonicalization syntax to enable conformance
testing;
4. fix bugs.
We will not change XTM or HyTM in ways that will render
existing topic maps syntactically invalid.
(From Patrick's notes in N376)
I interpreted this to be a very clear statement that we would *not* be
adding new features.
Steve
--
Steve Pepper, Chief Executive Officer <pepper@ontopia.net>
Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps)
Ontopia AS, Waldemar Thranes gt. 98, N-0175 Oslo, Norway.
http://www.ontopia.net/ phone: +47-23233080 GSM: +47-90827246