[sc34wg3] Topic Maps land and SAM land

[Jan Algermissen]

Lars Marius Garshol wrote:

> Now I'm surprised again: why do you say "a syntax processing model of
> a TM"? Where does syntax enter the picture?

The current official draft of the SAM is based on XML infoset. And XML
infoset is what the current SAM's underlying processing model is. Without
such a thing, it is impossible to make any sense of a processed syntax.

Suppose we wanted to define the SAM in RM terms, it would absolutely make
sense to me to still base the processing model for XTM on XML infoset.


Jan



> --
> Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
> GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sc34wg3 mailing list
> sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
> http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3

-- 
Jan Algermissen                           http://www.topicmapping.com
Consultant & Programmer	                  http://www.gooseworks.org