[sc34wg3] Let's revert to N323!

[Patrick Durusau]

Steve,

Steve Pepper wrote:

> Baltimore was a very productive meeting in many ways, especially
> in terms of resolving issues in the SAM. But the decisions we took
> relating to the "roadmap" have simply caused confusion.
>
> Until then we had documented consensus on the direction we were
> taking, as shown in N323
>
>    http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/document/0323.htm

If your proposal is to use N0323 as a starting point for discussion (cf. 
your call at the end of this message) and to clarify what the consensus 
*means* in terms of actual work, I don't see the difference from what 
Lars said several posts ago. Do you see your post as calling for 
something different? (Just checking because that was my understanding of 
Lars' original post(s) on this topic and want to make sure I am not 
missing something.)

<snip>

> I ask everyone else to focus on N323 and say what, if anything, they
> disagree with there and what, if anything, they feel is too vague and
> needs to be expanded.
>
<snip>

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@emory.edu
Co-Editor, ISO Reference Model for Topic Maps