[sc34wg3] The interpretation of facets

[Michel Biezunski]

Lars:

> Right. What would integration mean, in these two cases? These are
> specifications written by people outside ISO, so how would we
> "integrate" these with topic maps? Do you mean to define a mapping
> from these syntaxes to the RM (or SAM), or do you mean something more?

One of the purpose of TMM/RM is to be able to express
them as full topic maps, even if they contain
assertion types that are not part of the SAM.

Michel
===================================
Michel Biezunski
Coolheads Consulting
402 85th Street #5C
Brooklyn, New York 11209
Email:mb@coolheads.com
Web  :http://www.coolheads.com
Voice: (718) 921-0901
==================================