TMCL Uniqueness rule Re: [sc34wg3] Draft Reference Model

[Sam Hunting]

I mean, the RM would provide the tools for definition through clause 5,
not do the defining. I agree there's every reason to avoid doing this
twice. 

Not sure what you mean by "once for topic maps and once for the RM". I'd
be a little reluctant to say that the RM had nothing to do with topic
maps, wouldn't you?

> 
> * Sam Hunting
> |
> | [SDIPs & TMCL uniqueness rules]
> |
> | Off hand, it looks to me like can handle all that, which makes me
> | cheerful. Of course, the devil is in the details...
> 
> I expect a solution is possible, but we need to do it right, so that
> we don't have to specify this mechanism twice: once for topic maps and
> once for the RM.
> 
> 

Sam Hunting
eTopicality, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Turn your searching experience into a finding experience."(tm)

Topic map consulting and training: www.etopicality.com
Free open source topic map tools:  www.gooseworks.org

XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------