[sc34wg3] SAM-issue term-scope-def

[Marc de Graauw]

 * Marc de Graauw
> |
> | I see 3 ways around this problem:
> |
> | 1) Drop the word 'only' in the SAM. Topic Map 1 does not say
> | anything about the validity of the basename when {german} does not
> | apply.
>

*Lars Marius Garshol

> We need to do that, and get in something like the "only known to be
> valid when" instead. I'm still not sure why you weren't happy with
> that solution.

Because 'only known to be valid' sounds as if we would need many-valued
logic. And that would raise the question 'which many-valued logic'? Other
than that I think this solution is fine.

Marc