[tmql-wg] TMQL, next round
rho at bigpond.net.au
Wed Mar 7 21:51:47 EST 2007
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:28:58PM +0100, Lars Heuer wrote:
> I think the date/time datatypes are a 'nice to have' but I don't mind
> if they don't make it not into the standard.
> Sidenote: SPARQL does not support any date/time datatype natively.
I think it is too early to say something about SPARQL.
> Ok. The question is, if we want all functions in the default
> namespace or if we provide an own namespace for it
Or - if we assume that 'tmql' is the default namespace - whether
functions should live there or have their own namespace. And ....
> and define a minimum set of functions which all impl. have to
Exactly. Which implicitely means "whatever we choose will be wrong for
More information about the tmql-wg