[tmql-wg] TMQL, next round
heuer at semagia.com
Wed Mar 7 09:28:58 EST 2007
>> IMO the following datatypes should make it into TMQL:
>> - xs:date
>> - xs:dateTime ???
>> - xs:time ???
> ??? means 'maybe'?
Yes, it means "maybe". Sorry, I should have made it more explicit. :)
I think the date/time datatypes are a 'nice to have' but I don't mind
if they don't make it not into the standard.
Sidenote: SPARQL does not support any date/time datatype natively.
> Well, there is no _strict_ dependency, but I would find it somewhat
> sleazy to offer a data type, but not the functions related with it.
> So with xsd:string would come
Ok. The question is, if we want all functions in the default namespace
or if we provide an own namespace for it and define a minimum set of
functions which all impl. have to support.
More information about the tmql-wg