[tmql-wg] Proposed new requirement: Database implementation
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 17:23:40 +1000
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:50:32PM +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> * Kal Ahmed
> | To be honest then I think that this is a non-requirement.
> So far we have one +1 (me), one +/-0 (Robert), and one -1 (Kal). Looks
> like this requirement is going to stay out of the document unless
> someone is willing to speak up for it.
Actually, I agree in this matter fully with Kal, but I did not want to
be destructive in my initial posting. :-)
What remains, though, is the non-functional requirement that the
language must be reasonably implementable. So it must not rely on FOL