[tmql-wg] Proposed new requirement: Database implementation

Robert Barta rho@bigpond.net.au
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:05:03 +1000

On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:15:21PM +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> | I am not sure what historians would think about this in 10 years. I
> | appreciate the interest to map everything into RDBMs, but I am not
> | sure whether this concern should have a very high priority.
> I agree we shouldn't make this requirement an absolute requirement,
> precisely for this reason. That's why I phrased it as a "should",
> which means it's just a goal. I think this will be important
> initially, and then progressively less important as time goes by.
> How does that sound?

Salvage to my suffering soul! :)