<div dir="ltr">Hi all,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Lars Heuer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:heuer@semagia.com">heuer@semagia.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Patrick,<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> It would be real helpful if the editors could be prepare a summary<br>
> response (no particular form) to these and other comments so we could<br>
</div>[...]<br>
<br>
ACK.<br>
<br>
<br>
[...]<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> PS: I am assuming that we should start with CTM, followed by TMCL and<br>
> TMQL. But that is just my assumption. Is there any feeling among the<br>
> editors that another order would be more productive?<br>
</div></blockquote><div><br>Unfortunately I will arrive on Tuesday thus I hope we also might do ctm, tmcl and tmql in two iterations on both days or so? <br><br>I also have another question: Is it an idea to discuss some ISO work items also on Wednesday? I know that several editors and contributors are going to the workshop sessions but I also know that some persons are not and that they might discuss other items. Who is not going to a workshop and might be interested?<br>
<br>best,<br><br>Gabriel<br></div></div><br>
</div>