<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Lars Heuer wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1182680855.20080123134153@semagia.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Xuân,
[...]
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Yes, especially as CTM as specified in the drafts so has not been
parseable by common regular expression parsers, either.. ;-)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
That's simply not true. You should give reasons if you think it is not
parsable.
Best regards,
Lars
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hi Lars,<br>
<br>
here is one recent example, thanks to Steve:<br>
<br>
Steve Pepper wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:02df01c8611e$c3487d00$0800000a@huchu" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">[...]
You can if you want, though I wouldn't recommend it:
donald = <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:donald@duck.org">mailto:donald@duck.org</a> {
- "Donald Duck";
- "Anders And" @norwegian;
}
This would work, unless you had declared a prefix called
'mailto', in which case the parser would try to interpret the
IRI as a QName and you would get a syntax error.
</pre>
</blockquote>
This is neither regular nor context free. IMNSHO, CTM should be a
context free language. We should not make CTM as hard as C++ in
parsing, both for humans and computers. I also do not see necessity for
CTM being not context free, does anybody else see such a necessity?<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:02df01c8611e$c3487d00$0800000a@huchu" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Steve
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
ciao,<br>
Xuân.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>