From patrick at durusau.net Thu Aug 21 16:08:51 2008 From: patrick at durusau.net (Patrick Durusau) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:08:51 -0400 Subject: [sc34wg3] TMCL- 4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 7 Message-ID: <48ADCB53.3060808@durusau.net> Greetings! Just a formatting error but one that will come back to haunt us when ITTF sees the text for publication: Clauses 4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 7 are incorrect. If there are multiple clauses following a main clause, then the main clause should not have any content. Paragraph 3 does it correctly. To correct paragraph 4, for example, it would read: 4. TMCL 4.1 General TMCL defines constraint types and ..... Note that as re-written, a reference to 4.1 General, makes it possible to unambiguously reference that material. As originally written, if I said 4 TMCL, did I mean the content immediately following 4 or did I mean all of 4, including all its subsections? Can't say. This particular issue can be solved by simply inserting a "General" clause in each case. Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick at durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Aug 26 11:26:24 2008 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:26:24 -0000 Subject: No subject Message-ID: cardmin/max occurrence is optional, then one just has to test whether it exists: where ... $this / cardmin & count (whatever) < $this / cardmin # this is a violation & $this / cardmax & count (whatever) > $this / cardmax # this is bad too How CTM deals with non-existing things at invocation time, is a different matter. \rho